| |
This
five-day seminar will focus on known and prospective problems associated
with drilling in ever deeper water, including an added section examining
some recently introduced equipment. With the knowledge presented
in this seminar, you will learn of downtime others have suffered,
which will help you to look for and avoid repeating the same costly
events.
Experts
from our in-house staff are used to present topics in their field
of expertise. For instance, Greg Childs presents many ram locking
system issues, Ed Lewis presents BOP control systems, and Michael
Montgomery topics such as riser management and predictive testing.
Learning
objectives for each module are stated in the course outline.
Please
bring the pertinent API Specifications and RP's to use as a reference
during the seminar.
Workshops:
Immediately following lunch, three workshops will be given which
have previously received fantastic evaluations.
1)
Shearing, presented by Greg Childs
2) Dropped Stack, presented by Ed Lewis
3) Secondary Intervention, presented by Ed Lewis
SECTION I-
INTRODUCTION
Introduction,
Seminar Basis and What's Different
| |
1.
|
Safety
in the "Cotton Gin" |
| |
2.
|
Understand
WEST's information systems |
| |
3.
|
ITP's = "Inspection and Test Procedures" - Information
available |
| |
4.
|
Anomaly
Data Base - Lesson's learned, so as not to be repeated |
| |
5.
|
"RigLore"
- Engineering Bulletins and Product Alerts "at your fingertips" |
| |
6.
|
Where
and when does downtime occur in deepwater drilling? |
| |
7.
|
Standards
to which we assess |
| |
8.
|
Direct and indirect costs (What does it cost to pull a stack?) |
| |
9.
|
Risk
analysis and how to minimize downtime |
SECTION II
- QUALITY MANAGEMENT
| |
1. |
Let's be a learning industry; product performance reports, reference
API Spec 16A, API RP 53 ISO 9000; API Q1 program |
| |
2. |
Document control: O & M manuals, engineering bulletins and
product alerts |
| |
3. |
Operational management |
| |
4. |
Why are the API quality systems not working? (API Q1, API RP
53 and API Spec 16A) |
| |
5. |
Regulatory issues and industry standards |
| |
6. |
What should your response be when they say "Certified"? |
SECTION III
- HYDRAULIC CONTROLS - MUX
BOP
Control Systems - Schematic Review and Introduction
Due
to Cameron's market share with deepwater systems, this control system
is our focus during Deepwater Challenges, DWC. The WEST "Drill
Through Equipment" course highlights the Shaffer/Koomey control
system, because of the market share with piloted control systems.
| |
1. |
Hydraulic
power units (HPU), five components of a control system |
| |
2. |
Control components and their symbols |
| |
3. |
Accumulators
|
| |
|
a. |
bladder type |
| |
|
b. |
float type |
| |
|
c. |
effects of deep water on subsea accumulator useable volume |
| |
4. |
Pods
and their operation |
| |
5. |
Valves |
| |
|
a. |
solenoid,
shear seal and multi-position |
| |
|
b. |
pod designs, regulators and shuttle valve designs |
| |
6. |
Quick
response systems |
| |
H. |
Hydraulic
hoses |
| |
G. |
Simple
hydraulic circuits |
Cameron Multiplex Control Systems - Hydraulic Part #1
| |
1. |
Introduce 5,000 psi components of the system |
| |
2. |
Fluid cleanliness - NAS levels and bacteria |
| |
3. |
Control panels and alarms |
| |
4. |
Cable reels, level wind and slip rings |
| |
5. |
Cameron Safety Alert #1820078 (Float Type Accumulators) |
| |
6. |
High flow rates and flowmeters |
| |
7. |
Learn the internal components of a Cameron multiplex pod |
| |
8. |
BOP
Stack hoses or hard pipe? Learn from the experiences of others |
Accumulator
Volume
| |
1. |
Describe Accumulator functions |
| |
2. |
List requirements of standards and regulations |
| |
3. |
Review changes to deepwater drilling |
| |
4. |
Review calculation methods and assumptions |
| |
5. |
Compare methods |
| |
6. |
Dynamic
hydraulic modeling and thermo adiabatic corrections |
| |
7. |
API
Spec. 16D and usable fluid & shearing requirements |
| |
8. |
Make recommendations |
Cameron
Multiplex Control Systems - Part #2
| |
1. |
Solenoid
valves, Type 15 vs. Type 63 |
| |
2. |
Pod
valves and 70 durometer o-ring extrusion |
| |
3. |
Double
piloted control valves |
| |
4. |
Manual
5,000 to 3,000 psi regulators |
| |
5. |
Biased
shuttle valve applications |
| |
6. |
Gilmore
shuttle valves and applications |
| |
7. |
Flow
rates and flow restrictions |
| |
8. |
Regulator
circuits and shear bypass |
| |
9. |
Pre-qualification
of control valves |
| |
10. |
Cold
start of dead pods |
| |
11. |
Cameron's
Premium Valves |
SECTION IV
- MARINE DRILLING RISER
New,
Interchangeability and Quality
| |
1. |
How
much down time do we experience with riser? |
| |
2. |
Understand
the API Specification 16R load rating categories |
| |
3. |
Drill-Quip
main tube cracking in new riser |
| |
4. |
Sour
gas considerations for riser, API RP 16Q and NACE |
| |
5. |
Toughness
- charpy impact testing and modulus of resilience |
| |
6. |
ABB
Vetco MR 10 main tube cracking in new riser |
| |
7. |
SSQR-F
Riser - Stewart and Stevenson riser failure (threaded insert)
|
| |
8. |
Cameron's
CamCheck riser inspection capabilities |
| |
9. |
Riser
interchangeability issues, new and replacement (Does Vetco
MR 6D = SS or Shaffer?) |
| |
10. |
Industry
standard for allowable C/K box pitting |
| |
11. |
RP
16Q, riser operating manuals |
Handling,
TJ's, Spiders and Support Rings
| |
1. |
Introduce
riser and telescopic joint handling systems |
| |
2. |
Telescopic
joint support rings and improved efficiency |
| |
3. |
TJ
locking systems for semi's and drill ships |
| |
4. |
Dynamic
load factors on riser handling tools |
| |
5. |
Wellhead
torque induced from tensioner support ring |
Tension,
Collapse, Buoyancy and Keyseating
| |
1. |
Brief
review of riser tensioning |
| |
2. |
Hydralift
250K inline tensioners |
| |
3. |
Field
repair of Hydralift tensioner rods |
| |
4. |
Effective
riser tension vs. theoretical riser tension |
| |
5. |
Instrumentation
joints and riser control boxes (RCB's) |
| |
6. |
Buoyancy
modules and IADC safety alerts |
| |
7. |
Riser
collapse considerations and variable |
| |
8. |
Fill
up valve designs and installation locations |
| |
9. |
Collapse
resistance of c/k hoses at depth, reference API Spec. 16C, section
9.14.10 |
| |
10. |
Buoyancy
placement, fairings and high current considerations - VIV |
| |
11. |
DEA
Study #137 - Deepwater Keyseating Frequencies |
SECTION V
- ANNULARS
Annular
Preventers and Flex Joints
| |
1. |
Hydrostatic
head, annulars and shuttle valves: what do they have in common? |
| |
2. |
Design
Verification Testing, or the lack of it, hits us again |
| |
3. |
Pro's
and Con's of closing an annular during an EDS |
| |
4. |
The
effects of hydrostatic head on closing pressure required |
SECTION VI
- RAMS
Packer
Pressure, Shearing and Design Verification
| |
1. |
Ram
reliability - define decrease in reliability |
| |
2. |
Effects
of mud weight and wellbore pressure on closing ratio's |
| |
3. |
Sealing
characteristics tests, API Spec 16A |
| |
4. |
Factors
effecting probability of shear - review shearing data |
| |
5. |
Mississippi
Canyon, "Why we need ram locking systems" |
| |
6. |
Design
verification testing, API 16A |
| |
7. |
Hang-off
and stripping capabilities |
| |
8. |
When
hydrostatic head is greater than wellbore pressure |
| |
9. |
Hydrostatic
head hits us again, casing shear rams |
| |
10. |
How
has tool joint design changed hang-off? |
Cameron
- "ST" Locks
| |
1. |
Brief
review of Cameron locking systems |
| |
2. |
"ST"
locks and sequencing valves |
| |
3. |
Bearing
issues and upgrades introduced |
| |
4. |
Predictive
testing ST locks |
| |
5. |
"Backlash" of locking systems |
Cameron
- "RamLocks"
| |
1. |
Control
circuits |
| |
2. |
Case
histories |
| |
3. |
Backlash
issues |
| |
4. |
Do
we still have manufacturing quality issues with Swarf? |
Shaffer
- UltraLock
| |
1. |
How
we got to the II B design, will there be a II C? |
| |
2. |
Advantages
of the 5½ degree taper, review modifications and case
histories |
| |
3. |
Understand
the sequence of operation with an UltraLock animation |
| |
4. |
Understand
why operating pressures have been limited on the IIA design |
Predictive
Testing - Hydril MPL LOCKS and Cameron ST Locks and UltraLocks
| |
1. |
Case
history - predictive testing is better than money in the bank |
| |
2. |
Hydril
MPL case study - testing predicted failure within 10 cycles |
| |
3. |
Slip-ease
bearing and the Hydril MPL locking system |
| |
4. |
Cameron
ST predictive testing success |
| |
5. |
How
acoustic testing is useful on all equipment |
| |
6. |
Understand
how backlash effects ram packer pressure |
| |
7. |
Slip
force review and how it applies to RamLocks and UltraLocks |
| |
8. |
Sealing
characteristics tests - prudent equipment operators should have
this information |
| |
9. |
Learn
how API suggests we qualify ram locking systems, 12 cycles are
required |
SECTION VII
- SHEAR WORKSHOP
Case
I - Cameron TL 18 ¾" 15K
Case
II - Hydril BOP 18 ¾" 15K
Case
III - Shaffer SLX 18 ¾" 15K
SECTION VIII
- CONNECTORS and END CONNECTIONS
| |
1. |
Review
Cameron's connectors and the preferred "Everslick"
actuator ring coating |
| |
2. |
Learn
the relationship between locking pressure, lubrication (coefficient
of friction) and preload |
| |
3. |
Review
"Backdriving" |
| |
4. |
Why
Cameron EB 842 rev. B1 recommends a secondary lock on connectors |
| |
5. |
Understand
the relationship between lubricating your connector, POCVs and
continuous latching pressure |
| |
6. |
Discuss
the advantages of having a third regulator for connectors, reference
Cameron EB 687C |
| |
7. |
Vetco
Connectors, OSP #335 and how the coefficient of friction changes
over time |
| |
8. |
Compare
and understand bending moment capacities of various connectors/
end connections |
| |
9. |
Understand
options available for hydrate exclusion |
| |
10. |
Review
a failure related to hydrostatic head, reference Cameron EB
848M |
| |
11. |
Cameron
C & K Connectors and damaged gaskets |
SECTION IX-
FAIL SAFE VALVES
| |
1. |
Learn
the "Functional limitations of subsea valves" consider
the Ocean Odyssey |
| |
2. |
Learn
"What is a failsafe valve", balanced vs. unbalanced
valves |
| |
3. |
Failsafe
assist circuit - Understand deepwater hazards when pulling the
stack and how to reduce them |
| |
4. |
Understand
the differences between a API Spec 6A and 17D valve operator |
| |
5. |
Understand
the MMS concerns for valves under the LPR. How to reduce this
risk |
| |
6. |
"Frame
Flex Test" - Reduce bending moments to C/K outlets |
| |
7. |
WOM
"Magnum" valve pressure testing techniques |
| |
8. |
Reliability
of spring cartridges in gate valves |
SECTION X
- MUX CONTROLS - SPARKY
Electrical
| |
1. |
Progression of BOP controls from mechanical to MUX |
| |
|
a. |
purely mechanical valve |
| |
|
b. |
hydraulic / air remote operation |
| |
|
c. |
electrical solenoid remote operation |
| |
|
d. |
solenoids moved to bop stack 1975 |
| |
|
e. |
as functions increase, signals to solenoids are multiplexed
in 1975 to reduce cable cost |
| |
|
f. |
the future may bring AI, fuzzy logic, disappearance of MUX cable |
| |
2. |
Definition of multiplex |
| |
3. |
How a multiplex system works |
| |
4. |
Why multiplex must be used for current subsea control technology |
| |
5. |
Advantages of multiplex control systems |
| |
6. |
Simple multiplex systems |
| |
7. |
Subsea multiplex systems |
| |
8. |
Architectures, system construction, and common problems of MUX
manufacturers |
| |
|
a. |
Cameron |
| |
|
b. |
Shaffer |
| |
|
c. |
Hydril |
| |
|
d. |
ABB |
| |
|
e. |
importance of integration with other shipboard systems - DP
and drilling |
| |
|
f. |
cables
and connectors |
| |
|
|
i. |
compliance
with API Spec 16D |
| |
|
|
ii. |
wet
mate and dry mate connectors |
| |
|
|
iii. |
service
life of cables and splicing issues |
| |
|
|
iv. |
connector
choice, repair and replacement |
| |
|
|
v. |
slip
rings, cable reels, and strain relief |
| |
|
|
vi. |
conductor
size, cable construction, and voltage drop issues |
| |
|
|
vii. |
cable
and connector failure modes |
| |
|
|
viii. |
Petrobras
electrical connectors |
| |
|
g. |
stack
mounted sensors |
| |
|
|
i. |
angle,
pressure and temperature |
| |
|
|
ii. |
current,
flow, tension and position |
SECTION XI
- OPERATIONS / PROCEDURES
Dynamic
Positioning
| |
1. |
Why
and when dynamic positioning (DP) is used |
| |
2. |
Advantages
and disadvantages |
| |
3. |
Basic
overview of DP operations |
| |
4. |
DP2
vs. DP3 and how this choice affects drilling and cost |
| |
5. |
Importance
of power management and blackouts |
| |
6. |
Acoustic
beacon arrays and acoustic interference |
| |
7. |
DP
watch circles and disconnect criteria |
| |
8. |
Thruster
induced rig motions and effect on drilling operations |
| |
9. |
Riser
/ moonpool contact |
| |
10. |
DP
drilling operations planning - too complex to cover at this
time, separate seminar required |
SECTION XII
- RISER RECOIL AND HARD vs SOFT HANGOFF
| |
1. |
Define
the purpose of a riser recoil system |
| |
2. |
Shaffer's
- overview |
| |
3. |
Hydralift
- overview and advantages |
| |
4. |
Is
hard or soft the best answer? What are the issues? |
| |
5. |
Telescopic
joint contact with the moonpool, when does this occur |
| |
6. |
Hang-off
joints and Bardex riser centralizing systems |
| |
7. |
Dynamic
load factors for riser, shock absorbing spiders |
SECTION XIII
- SECONDARY INTERVENTION
Automatic
Intervention
| |
1.
|
What
systems are available? |
| |
2.
|
Dead
man, automatic mode function (AMF) Cameron system |
Manual
Intervention
| |
1. |
Acoustic
Control |
| |
|
a. |
What
geographic areas use acoustic controls |
| |
|
b. |
Explore reliability |
| |
|
c. |
Nautronix, Sonardyne, Simrad |
| |
2. |
EHBU
(electro hydraulic back-up system) Shaffer system |
| |
3. |
ROV |
| |
|
a. |
ROV
flow rate capabilities and intervention points |
| |
|
b. |
Gap
analysis - what additional ROV functions should you have on
your stack? |
| |
|
|
Are ROV's intervention points fit for purpose? Function testing |
SECONDARY
INTERVENTION WORKSHOP
SECTION XIV
- CRISES MANAGEMENT
Dropped
Stacks and Emergency Recovery
This
module is a blast, we get plenty of interaction. Everyone has a
story and appreciates learning from the experiences of others.
| |
1. |
WEST's "Dropped Stack Study", an overview |
| |
2. |
MMS Safety Alert #186, Accidental LMRP Disconnect |
| |
3. |
Are rams capable of closing and sealing on flowing wellbore
fluids? |
| |
4. |
The "Six P's" = prior planning prevents poor performance |
| |
5. |
Slings, funnels and drill pipe recovery |
DROPPED
STACK WORKSHOP
Select
this link to access the Registration Form.
return
to top
|